[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On 28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > + cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf), > > nohz_extended_mask); > > + pr_info("NO_HZ: Experimental full dynticks CPUs: %s.\n", nohz_ext_buf); > > I'd suggest removing the 'experimental' word. We are not sending anything > experimental to Linus: we'll send something that is tested and that we > expect to not break anything. (and which we'll fix if it does) In that case, should we vector a patch through PaulM to clobber these too? $ git grep xperiment |grep rcu kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: printk(KERN_INFO "\tExperimental boot-time adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n", rcu_fanout_leaf); kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental no-CBs CPUs: %s.\n", nocb_buf); kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental polled no-CBs CPUs.\n"); Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
