From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> The original ring-buffer code had special checks at the start of rb_advance_iter() and instead of repeating them again at the end of the function if a certain condition existed, I just did a recursive call to rb_advance_iter() because the special condition would cause rb_advance_iter() to return early (after the checks).
But as things have changed, the special checks no longer exist and the only thing done for the special_condition is to call rb_inc_iter() and return. Instead of doing a confusing recursive call, just call rb_inc_iter instead. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c index ce8514f..6ff9cc4 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c @@ -3425,7 +3425,7 @@ static void rb_advance_iter(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter) /* check for end of page padding */ if ((iter->head >= rb_page_size(iter->head_page)) && (iter->head_page != cpu_buffer->commit_page)) - rb_advance_iter(iter); + rb_inc_iter(iter); } static int rb_lost_events(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer) -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
