On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:43:46PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 12-12-12 16:43:35, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > In certain cases (kswapd reclaim, memcg target reclaim), a fixed
> > minimum amount of pages is scanned from the LRU lists on each
> > iteration, to make progress.
> > 
> > Do not make this minimum bigger than the respective LRU list size,
> > however, and save some busy work trying to isolate and reclaim pages
> > that are not there.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
> 
> Hmm, shrink_lruvec would do:
>       nr_to_scan = min_t(unsigned long,
>                          nr[lru], SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX);
>       nr[lru] -= nr_to_scan;
> and isolate_lru_pages does
>       for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && !list_empty(src); scan++)
> so it shouldn't matter and we shouldn't do any additional loops, right?
> 
> Anyway it would be beter if get_scan_count wouldn't ask for more than is
> available.

Consider the inactive_list_is_low() check (especially expensive for
memcg anon), lru_add_drain(), lru lock acquisition...

And as I wrote to Mel in the other email, this can happen a lot when
you have memory cgroups in a multi-node environment.

> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

Thanks!

> > @@ -1748,15 +1748,17 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, 
> > struct scan_control *sc,
> >  out:
> >     for_each_evictable_lru(lru) {
> >             int file = is_file_lru(lru);
> > +           unsigned long size;
> >             unsigned long scan;
> >  
> > -           scan = get_lru_size(lruvec, lru);
> > +           size = get_lru_size(lruvec, lru);
> +             size = scan = get_lru_size(lruvec, lru);
> 
> >             if (sc->priority || noswap) {
> > -                   scan >>= sc->priority;
> > +                   scan = size >> sc->priority;
> >                     if (!scan && force_scan)
> > -                           scan = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
> > +                           scan = min(size, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX);
> >                     scan = div64_u64(scan * fraction[file], denominator);
> > -           }
> > +           } else
> > +                   scan = size;
> 
> And this is not necessary then but this is totally nit.

Do you actually find this more readable?  Setting size = scan and then
later scan = size >> sc->priority? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to