Jeff Moyer <[email protected]> writes:

>>> +           bdi->flusher_cpumask = kmalloc(sizeof(cpumask_t), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +           if (!bdi->flusher_cpumask)
>>> +                   return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> The bare GFP_KERNEL raises an eyebrow.  Some bdi_init() callers like
>> blk_alloc_queue_node() look like they'll want to pass in a gfp_t for the
>> allocation.
>
> I'd be surprised if that was necessary, seeing how every single caller
> of blk_alloc_queue_node passes in GFP_KERNEL.  I'll make the change,
> though, there aren't too many callers of bdi_init out there.

No other callers of bdi_init want anything but GFP_KERNEL.  In the case
of blk_alloc_queue_node, even *it* doesn't honor the gfp_t passed in!
Have a look at blkcg_init_queue (called from blk_alloc_queue_node) to
see what I mean.  Maybe that's a bug?

I've written the patch to modify bdi_init to take a gfp_t, but I'm
actually not in favor of this change, so I'm not going to post it
(unless, of course, you can provide a compelling argument).  :-)

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to