On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:21 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > >> > I don't see kbasename() anywhere. Is this based off of other patches? > >> It's introduced by first patch in the series. > > Usually a series has the format of: > > > > [PATCH x/n] .... > > > > Where x is the patch number and n is the total number of patches. I'm > > not sure what a v2.5 is. This is version 2 and a half? > Ah, it's an update to patch 6/6. You could see it by > Message-Id/In-Reply-To chains. >
OK, that's where the confusion stems from. The original patch 6/6 had in the patch: Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> (maintainer:TRACING) Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> (maintainer:TRACING) But I neither I nor Frederic were on the actual Cc (I had to open my LKML folder to see it). Perhaps whatever tool you used to send the patches got confused by the (maintainer:TRACING) line. Thus, the only thing that ended up in my INBOX was the [PATCHv2.5] one. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
