* Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > From: Lee Schermerhorn <[email protected]>
> >
> > This patch augments the MPOL_MF_LAZY feature by adding a
> > "NOOP" policy to mbind(). When the NOOP policy is used with
> > the 'MOVE and 'LAZY flags, mbind() [check_range()] will walk
> > the specified range and unmap eligible pages so that they
> > will be migrated on next touch.
>
> This patch is mistitled. The new flag is MPOL_NOOP. That made
> it difficult to find the commit in linux-next. Does it make
> sense to fix the patch title before this hits mainline?
In isolation such a minor title problem alone does not justify
rebasing.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
