On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 12:04:32PM +0530, Hemanth Selam wrote:
> This corrects 2 misspellings and repeated words in comments.  Each is a
> separate patch so that any one of them can be dropped without touching
> the rest.
> 
> Nothing outside comments changes.  Every touched C file was checked by
> dropping its comments, replacing each string literal with a placeholder
> and collapsing whitespace; what remained was identical before and after,
> so the compiled code cannot differ.
> 
> The mistakes were found with scripts/checkpatch.pl against the list in
> scripts/spelling.txt.  The scanning, the edits and the changelogs were
> produced with Cursor running the claude-opus-5 model, from a request to
> find and fix spelling mistakes across the tree, and every correction was
> then re-checked by the comparison described above.  Words that name an
> identifier were left alone deliberately, even when they read as typos,
> because correcting the prose would make the comment disagree with the
> code it describes.
> 
> Tested by building x86_64 defconfig at v7.3-rc1-269-gbc35965f6940, which
> is clean.  Nothing else was built, so any patch touching code that
> x86_64 defconfig does not compile has been read but not compiled.

This one is a NAK

Not going to churn for non user visible typos.

> 
> Hemanth Selam (2):
>   nvdimm: fix typos in comments
>   tools/testing: fix repeated word 'from' in comment
> 
>  drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c  | 2 +-
>  include/linux/libnvdimm.h        | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 

Reply via email to