On 9/16/26 15:45, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 16-09-26 15:28:01, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 9/16/26 15:19, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> >>> Yes, no dispute on that. But we have HW poisoning for exactly that >>> purpose, no? >> >> Well, that tells you that the page content is effectively gone and should be >> tried to be recovered / migrated away. Unless I am messing up terminology >> here. > > Maybe it is me messing up the terminology... > But I guess we have established that whether soft offlining is being > abused or not, excluding hugetlb through a configuration is just a wrong > thing to do.
Yes, it's odd that you wouldn't want to evacuate hugetlb but everything else. -- Cheers, David
