On 11.09.26 23:33, Shreshth Srivastava wrote:
Hi Juergen,

I'm working on a v3 of Dave's "x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR
functions" series on top of yours, so I tried testing this patch.

You should look at [1] and [2] as well.


While I'm here: you mentioned you'd send a V3 after rc1 if conflicts
turned up. Is that still the plan? I wasn't sure whether to base on v2
plus the respins of 4 and 13, or wait.

I did send out V3 yesterday [3].


Most of the code this touches can't run on my box, so I compared compiled
output instead. Built patches 1-12, then 1-13, with the same .config and
compiler, and diffed "objdump -d" output for every .o in both trees. All
9396 objects came out identical. The 1-13 kernel boots fine under KVM.

Only tried the one config: x86_64, gcc 11.5.0,
CPU_SUP_{INTEL,AMD,ZHAOXIN}=y, HYPERV=y, KVM_INTEL=y, KVM_INTEL_TDX=y.

Tested-by: Shreshth Srivastava <[email protected]>

Thanks.


Juergen

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#t
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#t
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#t

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to