On 9/4/26 7:51 PM, Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> The GNU target-tuple prefixes shown in the CROSS_COMPILE examples are
> missing their trailing dash.
> 
> Fixes: 46201d47d6c4 ("Documentation: kunit: Reorganize documentation related 
> to running tests")
> Fixes: 957063874c76 ("Documentation: kunit: Add CLI args for kunit_tool")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Thanks.

> ---
>  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst 
> b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
> index cecc110a3399f..9221acddf3fa8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
> @@ -189,10 +189,10 @@ via UML. To run tests on qemu, by default it requires 
> two flags:
>    Kbuild. As a reminder, this will be the prefix for the toolchain
>    binaries such as GCC. For example:
>  
> -  - ``sparc64-linux-gnu`` if we have the sparc toolchain installed on
> +  - ``sparc64-linux-gnu-`` if we have the sparc toolchain installed on
>      our system.
>  
> -  - 
> ``$HOME/toolchains/microblaze/gcc-9.2.0-nolibc/microblaze-linux/bin/microblaze-linux``
> +  - 
> ``$HOME/toolchains/microblaze/gcc-9.2.0-nolibc/microblaze-linux/bin/microblaze-linux-``
>      if we have downloaded the microblaze toolchain from the 0-day
>      website to a directory in our home directory called toolchains.
>  
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ command line arguments:
>    - ``sparc64-linux-gnu-`` if we have the sparc toolchain installed on
>      our system.
>  
> -  - 
> ``$HOME/toolchains/microblaze/gcc-9.2.0-nolibc/microblaze-linux/bin/microblaze-linux``
> +  - 
> ``$HOME/toolchains/microblaze/gcc-9.2.0-nolibc/microblaze-linux/bin/microblaze-linux-``
>      if we have downloaded the microblaze toolchain from the 0-day
>      website to a specified path in our home directory called toolchains.
>  

-- 
~Randy

Reply via email to