On Mon, Aug 31, 2026, Shivank Garg wrote: > On Sun, 2026-08-23 at 13:36 +0000, Shivank Garg wrote: > > Split out the guest_memfd folio migration series [1], where migration part > > needs more discussion. These fixes, reported by Sashiko bot [2][3], are > > independent of it and can be reviewed on their own. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] > > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] > > > > Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <[email protected]> > > --- > > Shivank Garg (5): > > KVM: guest_memfd: take the invalidate lock when unbinding a dying file > > KVM: selftests: fix maxnode arguments in xapic_ipi_test > > KVM: selftests: use BITS_PER_TYPE() for NUMA masks > > KVM: selftests: add get_numa_mem_nodes() > > KVM: selftests: use allowed NUMA nodes in guest_memfd_test > > > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 86 > > ++++++++++++++++-------- > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h | 52 ++------------ > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/xapic_ipi_test.c | 14 ++-- > > virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 23 ++++--- > > 4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) > > --- > > base-commit: 2709dd5ae32f0828f386327c76bba9f39f63a1c6 > > change-id: 20260822-shivank-gmem-fix-split-b8a9057cf987 > > > > Best regards, > > Hi Sean, Paolo, > > Would you consider queuing this for next (7.4)?
No, I'm expecting a new version based on the discussion in patch 1. I also don't understand why the selftests changes are bundled in with what appears to be a completely unrelated bug fix.
