On Fri, 2026-08-14 at 10:36 +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote: > > Is this necessary for this patch? I see why to extract > > kvm_get_default_idt_limit() because now it's used twice. But why extract > > this > > define too? > > kvm_get_default_idt_limit() uses NUM_INTERRUPTS, and > kvm_get_default_idt_limit() is extracted as a helper from .c file to .h > file. Shouldn't the define of NUM_INTERRUPTS be moved together?
Err. yes. My bad. Trying to do too many things at once.
