> Nitpick. It's accurate for IPv6 which is the only address family that
> currently emits the new attribute. It's also accurate for IPv4. Other
> address families (MPLS / PHONET / IPMR) can start making use of
> strict_start_type in their policies, but it doesn't belong in this
> series.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]>

Thanks.

I also went through the two Sashiko runs on this series:

https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260808005642.26901-1-sigefriedhyy%40gmail.com
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260808005642.26901-1-sigefriedhyy%40gmail.com

Most of the comments describe the intermediate state of a split
series and are answered by later patches. The remaining one, the bare
OSError caught around the RA sent in the selftest, does not seem worth
a respin on its own; I will fix it if the series needs one more revision.

Thanks,
Yuyang

Reply via email to