On 7/31/26 12:28 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Somehow I confabulated the generic compatible being present in the > driver... I was trying to explain that > > And yes I didn't notice the 8350/8450 difference. But anyway, the > resolution will be one of: > > // 8450 is fully compatible > "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink", > "qcom,sm8450-pmic-glink", > "qcom,pmic-glink" > > or > > // 8475 is special > "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink", > "qcom,pmic-glink" > > depending on what you believe is more correct. I think the first > one fits better.
Yes, I agree the first case fits better, but I believe there is also a possible third case: // 8550 is fully compatible "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink", "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink", "qcom,pmic-glink" The reason why I believe this is that I've found SM8475 to include some elements such as eUSB or PHY sequences found in more recent SoCs such as SM8550. I guess that's the case since SM8475 is a respin, but I'm not sure. Regards, Esteban
