The rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm field is accessed only by the current CPU,
but can be accessed both at task level and from interrupt handlers.
All accesses from interrupts-enabled code must therefore be marked.
This commit therefore converts from __this_cpu_read() to this_cpu_read(),
from __this_cpu_write() to this_cpu_write(), and plain C-language accesses
to READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), but only in interrupts-enabled code.

KCSAN located this issue.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index c9780e7c0e2afa..377153e0d93440 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2540,7 +2540,7 @@ rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_data *rdp)
         * Was there a quiescent state since the beginning of the grace
         * period? If no, then exit and wait for the next call.
         */
-       if (rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm)
+       if (READ_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm))
                return;
 
        /*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index c3db1ad4a2807a..353effac5a37f1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -298,11 +298,11 @@ static void rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue(struct rcu_node *rnp, 
struct rcu_data *rdp)
 static void rcu_qs(void)
 {
        RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(preemptible(), "rcu_qs() invoked with preemption 
enabled!!!\n");
-       if (__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm)) {
+       if (this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm)) {
                trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_preempt"),
                                       __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.gp_seq),
                                       TPS("cpuqs"));
-               __this_cpu_write(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm, false);
+               this_cpu_write(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm, false);
                barrier(); /* Coordinate with rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq(). */
                WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs, false);
        }
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_strict(void)
         * __rcu_read_unlock().
         */
        rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
-       rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm = false;
+       WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm, false);
        rcu_report_qs_rdp(rdp);
        udelay(rcu_unlock_delay);
 }
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static void rcu_qs(void)
                return;
        trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_sched"),
                               __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.gp_seq), TPS("cpuqs"));
-       __this_cpu_write(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm, false);
+       this_cpu_write(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm, false);
        if (this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.exp))
                rcu_report_exp_rdp(this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data));
 }
-- 
2.40.1


Reply via email to