damon_max_nr_accesses(), which is a previous version of
damon_nr_samples_per_aggr() before the renaming, was wrongly returning
zero or random overflowed values for extreme intervals setup.  Commit
35d4a3cf70a8 ("mm/damon/ops-common: handle extreme intervals in
damon_hot_score()") updated the function to return correct or more valid
values.  Add a kunit test to ensure it is working as expected.

Signed-off-by: SJ Park <[email protected]>
---
 mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
index 3041b8288ec26..511f2856d343c 100644
--- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
+++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
@@ -619,6 +619,22 @@ static void damon_test_set_regions(struct kunit *test)
                        (struct damon_addr_range[]){}, 0, -EINVAL);
 }
 
+static void damon_test_nr_samples_per_aggr(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct damon_attrs attrs = {
+               .sample_interval = 0,
+               .aggr_interval = 0,
+       };
+
+       /* Zero aggregation interval doesn't cause division by zero */
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_samples_per_aggr(&attrs), 1);
+
+       /* Too large aggregation interval doesn't cause overflow */
+       attrs.aggr_interval = (unsigned long)UINT_MAX + 1;
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, damon_nr_samples_per_aggr(&attrs), 0);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, damon_nr_samples_per_aggr(&attrs), UINT_MAX);
+}
+
 static void damon_test_update_monitoring_result(struct kunit *test)
 {
        struct damon_attrs old_attrs = {
@@ -1670,6 +1686,7 @@ static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
        KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_above_half_progresses),
        KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_ops_registration),
        KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_regions),
+       KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_nr_samples_per_aggr),
        KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_update_monitoring_result),
        KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_attrs),
        KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_mvsum),
-- 
2.47.3

Reply via email to