On Mon, 2026-07-27 at 18:15 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Can the KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST changes be moved to the end of the series? The > total size of the series doesn't scare me, I just don't want to end up with > all > the fixes and cleanups stuck behind a patch that isn't a hard dependency. > E.g. > AFAICT, none of the following changes, include selftests updates, actualy rely > on KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST existing.
That only matters if we plan to backport them, surely? And I wasn't. I suspect it won't be pretty, but I can have a go at moving KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST to the end. I guess in a similar vein we'd want to move KVM_VCPU_TSC_SCALE to the end too. Some of the selftests will have to move too, as they do use those features.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
