On 7/22/26 13:18, Yeoreum Yun wrote: > Sorry. But do you mean check with cpu_feature_enabled() not with > boot_cpu_has()? > IIRC, the boot_cpu_has() doesn't use the DISABLE_MASK_BIT_SET() but > uses REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET() and I don't expect it wouldn't make > an optimisation to constant check which is contrast to DISABLE_MASK_BIT_SET().
Ahh, yes. I forgot about that nuance! Moving to cpu_feature_enabled() would be great!
