On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 12:29:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2026 15:26:28 -0400 Yury Norov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 12:18:06PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 May 2026 14:36:07 -0400 Yury Norov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is the equivalent for the "&*pb[l]" notation > > > > in printk-like functions. In some cases, it makes people to create > > > > temporary buffers for the printed cpumasks, where it can be avoided. > > > > > > > > Get rid of it in a favor of more standard printing API. > > > > > > > > Each patch, except for the last one, is independent and may be moved > > > > with > > > > the corresponding subsystem. Or I can take it in bitmap-for-next, at > > > > maintainers' discretion. > > > > > > > > On top of bitmap-for-next. > > > > > > Sashiko doesn't attempt bitmap-for-next, so it couldn't apply this series. > > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected] > > > > OK... What should I do about that? > > Rebase onto something which Sashiko *does* attempt. Mainline, a few > mm.git branches. Maybe linux-next.
Is Sashiko a new mandatory requirement now? Documentation doesn't even mention the bot. > Roman, is there a list of trees/branches which Sashiko tries to apply > series to? Hi Roman, Can you add bitmap-for-next in the list? Thanks, Yury
