On Thu, 21 May 2026 08:16:01 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > It might be but the point of this patchset (and the previous one that > > > made a similar change for /proc/pid/maps) is to reduce mmap_lock > > > contention, not to speed up the read operation, which is not a > > > performance critical part. > > > > Well, this interface has been around .. forever, so if there is a noticeable > > change in performance it should be called out. > > Sorry, I missed your reply. I'll see if I can adopt Paul's test for > /proc/pid/maps [1] for benchmarking smaps but I would expect similar > results as was reported in [2]. How's it coming along ;) > [1] https://github.com/paulmckrcu/proc-mmap_sem-test > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ I've moved this series to the tail of mm-unstable to permit more time.
