On Wed, 20 May 2026, Rosen Penev wrote:

> Simplifies allocations slightly.
> 
> Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <[email protected]>
> ---
>  v2: Rebase.
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c | 12 ++----------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c 
> b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c
> index 8faecc311038..66220fadf670 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c
> @@ -58,11 +58,11 @@ struct tpmi_plr_die {
>  
>  struct tpmi_plr {
>       struct dentry *dbgfs_dir;
> -     struct tpmi_plr_die *die_info;
>       int num_dies;
>       struct auxiliary_device *auxdev;
>       struct notifier_block nb;
>       struct mutex lock;      /* Protect access to dbgfs_dir */
> +     struct tpmi_plr_die die_info[] __counted_by(num_dies);
>  };
>  
>  static const char * const plr_coarse_reasons[] = {
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int intel_plr_probe(struct auxiliary_device 
> *auxdev, const struct auxilia
>       if (!num_resources)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> -     plr = devm_kzalloc(&auxdev->dev, sizeof(*plr), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     plr = devm_kzalloc(&auxdev->dev, struct_size(plr, die_info, 
> num_resources), GFP_KERNEL);

Hi,

I'd prefer to have devm_kzalloc_flex() be added before continuing with 
changes like this. Last time I mentioned it, you washed your hands about 
adding it and moved the responsability to linux-hardening folks. (In case 
you didn't know, devm_kzalloc_flex() could be added even by you!)

Alternatively, I might accept a good explanation why that cannot be done 
or is not a good idea to have consistent interface for non-devm vs devm?

>       if (!plr)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> @@ -315,13 +315,6 @@ static int intel_plr_probe(struct auxiliary_device 
> *auxdev, const struct auxilia
>  
>       intel_plr_register_notifier(&plr->nb);
>  
> -     plr->die_info = devm_kcalloc(&auxdev->dev, num_resources, 
> sizeof(*plr->die_info),
> -                                  GFP_KERNEL);
> -     if (!plr->die_info) {
> -             err = -ENOMEM;
> -             goto err_notify;
> -     }
> -
>       plr->num_dies = num_resources;
>       plr->dbgfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("plr", dentry);
>       plr->auxdev = auxdev;
> @@ -361,7 +354,6 @@ static int intel_plr_probe(struct auxiliary_device 
> *auxdev, const struct auxilia
>  
>  err:
>       debugfs_remove_recursive(plr->dbgfs_dir);
> -err_notify:
>       intel_plr_unregister_notifier(&plr->nb);
>  
>       return err;
> 

-- 
 i.


Reply via email to