On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:09:24 +0100 Rodrigo Alencar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 26/05/12 07:31PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 08 May 2026 18:00:17 +0100 > > Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > From: Rodrigo Alencar <[email protected]> > > > > > > DT-bindings for AD9910, a 1 GSPS DDS with 14-bit DAC. It includes > > > configurations for clocks, DAC current, reset and basic GPIO control. > > > > I think this is getting close enough now that for next version you should > > drop the RFC (which is probably gating DT binding folk giving it > > a detailed review!) > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Alencar <[email protected]> > > > > > + > > > + adi,dac-output-current-microamp: > > > + minimum: 8640 > > > + maximum: 31590 > > > + default: 20070 > > > + description: > > > + DAC full-scale output current in microamps. > > > + > > Can we use generic dac.yaml defined output-range-microamp? The base will be > > 0 always but > > that shouldn't matter. > > > > would that be fine even if we do not have those child channel nodes in the > device-tree node? > I think I'd rather we generalized to cover the 'one shared value' case rather then went with a vendor specific binding. Jonathan
