On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 03:49:33PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 4/15/26 5:20 PM, Antony Kurniawan Soemardi wrote: > > On 4/14/2026 3:07 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >> On 4/14/26 10:06 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >>> On 4/13/26 8:55 PM, Antony Kurniawan Soemardi via B4 Relay wrote: > >>>> From: Antony Kurniawan Soemardi <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> msm8960 uses the same clock descriptor as apq8064 but lacked the > >>> > >>> This doesn't quite seem to be the case, some fields differ and > >>> apq8064 additionally has: > >>> > >>> QCOM_RPM_PM8821_SMPS1 > >>> QCOM_RPM_PM8821_SMPS2 > >>> QCOM_RPM_PM8821_LDO1 > >>> QCOM_RPM_VDDMIN_GPIO > >> > >> Ah hmm, the MFD driver seems to provide *all* RPM resources.. > > > > What I meant by "clock descriptor" in the commit message was > > specifically the subset corresponding to RPM managed clocks. From what I > > can tell based on downstream code, msm8960 and apq8064 seem to share the > > same set of RPM clocks, even though the overall resource lists differ. > > > > Is that understanding correct? > > If that's struct msm_rpm_map_data on msm-3.x, then I see that 8x60 has: > > +MSM_RPM_MAP(PLL_4, PLL_4, 1), > +MSM_RPM_MAP(SMI_CLK, SMI_CLK, 1), > > While 8960 has: > -MSM_RPM_MAP(QDSS_CLK, QDSS_CLK, 1),
You are comparing 8x60 to 8960, while it should be 8960 to 8064. I see that there are differences, but the QDSS is the same. -- With best wishes Dmitry
