On 23/03/2026 5:55 am, Lai, Yi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 08:50:54AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 3/20/26 08:47, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> First, CPUID doesn't tell you if FRED is in use. Is it even on by
>>>> default yet? There might not be a better way to do this than checking
>>>> CPUID, but checking CPUID is imprecise at best.
>>> A reliable way to distinguish IDT and FRED mode is to:
>>>
>>> 1) Load $3 into %fs (x86_64) or %gs (i386) (i.e. whichever isn't thread
>>> local stoage)
>>> 2) execute a breakpoint, ignore the signal
>>> 3) Look to see whether %fs/%gs holds 3 or 0
>>>
>>> IRET has a fun behaviour where it zeroes NULL selectors even if they had
>>> a non-zero RPL.
>>>
>>> ERETU doesn't do this; Andy Luto and I asked for this minor information
>>> leak to be removed, and Intel agreed as it served no purpose anyone
>>> could identify.
>>>
>>> As a consequence, you can use it to determine whether the kernel used
>>> IRET or ERET to return back to userspace.
>> I was thinking of just grepping /proc/cpuinfo for "fred", but that
>> sounds much more fun! :)
> Thank you both for the review and suggestions. The behavioral difference
> between IRET and ERETU is a more robust way to detect FRED activation
> than checking CPUID.
>
> How about the following implementation to add a helper function to
> determine if FRED is enabled at runtime:
>
> static void empty_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx_void)
> {
> }
>
> static bool is_fred_enabled(void)
> {
>       unsigned short gs_val;
>
>       sethandler(SIGTRAP, empty_handler, 0);

What about setting SIG_IGN instead?

>
>       /*
>        * Distinguish IDT and FRED mode by loading GS with a non-zero RPL and
>        * triggering an exception:
>        * IDT (IRET) clears RPL bits of NULL selectors.
>        * FRED (ERETU) preserves them.
>        *
>        * If GS is loaded with 3 (Index=0, RPL=3), and we trigger an exception:
>        * Legacy should restore GS as 0.
>        * FRED should preserve GS as 3.
>        */
>       asm volatile(
>               "mov $3, %%ax\n\t"
>               "mov %%ax, %%gs\n\t"
>               "int3\n\t"
>               "mov %%gs, %%ax\n\t"
>               "mov %%ax, %0\n\t"
>               : "=r" (gs_val)
>               :
>               : "ax", "memory"
>       );

asm volatile (
    "mov %[rpl3], %%gs\n\t"
    "int3\n\t"
    "mov %%gs, %[res]"
    : [res] "=r" (gs_val)
    : [rpl3] "r" (3));

No need for any clobbers.  Let the compiler do the hard work for you.

~Andrew

Reply via email to