On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 08:44:05AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 3/18/26 08:33, Marvin Häuser wrote: > > As I haven’t found any news on the list or the tree, I'd like to > > inquire whether there’s been any updates on the situation. > > I'd summarize it like this: lots of meetings, no updates. > > IMNHO (and not speaking for my employer) DOITM itself is dead. There's > almost no chance of Linux ever doing anything with the existing, public > DOITM architecture.
Doesn't DOITM still need to be enabled by default for now, given that data-dependent timing is a backwards compatibility break and code hasn't been updated to account for it yet? - Eric
