On 2/23/26 16:30, Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN) wrote: >>> Replace list_for_each_entry_rcu() with list_for_each_entry_srcu() when >>> traversing the encl->mm_list protected by SRCU. This ensures proper >>> synchronization annotation and avoids potential lockdep warnings about >>> incorrect RCU usage. >>> >>> The list is protected by encl->srcu, not RCU, so the SRCU-specific >>> iterator with srcu_read_lock_held() annotation is required. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <[email protected]> >> Acked-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]> > Thanks for reviewing , and ping
It's a light NAK from me with the current changelog. I want a wee bit more background and some reasoning _somewhere_ about why this wasn't a bug when the code went in originally but arguably became a buglet at some point.
