During connect(), acting on a signal/timeout by disconnecting an already
established socket leads to several issues:

1. connect() invoking vsock_transport_cancel_pkt() ->
   virtio_transport_purge_skbs() may race with sendmsg() invoking
   virtio_transport_get_credit(). This results in a permanently elevated
   `vvs->bytes_unsent`. Which, in turn, confuses the SOCK_LINGER handling.

2. connect() resetting a connected socket's state may race with socket
   being placed in a sockmap. A disconnected socket remaining in a sockmap
   breaks sockmap's assumptions. And gives rise to WARNs.

3. connect() transitioning SS_CONNECTED -> SS_UNCONNECTED allows for a
   transport change/drop after TCP_ESTABLISHED. Which poses a problem for
   any simultaneous sendmsg() or connect() and may result in a
   use-after-free/null-ptr-deref.

Do not disconnect socket on signal/timeout. Keep the logic for unconnected
sockets: they don't linger, can't be placed in a sockmap, are rejected by
sendmsg().

[1]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
[2]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
[3]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/

Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Keep changes to minimum, fold in vsock_reset_interrupted() [Stefano]
- Link to v1: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 76763247a377..a9ca9c3b87b3 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1661,18 +1661,40 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct 
sockaddr *addr,
                timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
                lock_sock(sk);
 
-               if (signal_pending(current)) {
-                       err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
-                       sk->sk_state = sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? 
TCP_CLOSING : TCP_CLOSE;
-                       sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
-                       vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
-                       vsock_remove_connected(vsk);
-                       goto out_wait;
-               } else if ((sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) && (timeout == 0)) 
{
-                       err = -ETIMEDOUT;
+               /* Connection established. Whatever happens to socket once we
+                * release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
+                * into signal and timeout handling. Call it a day.
+                *
+                * Note that allowing to "reset" an already established socket
+                * here is racy and insecure.
+                */
+               if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
+                       break;
+
+               /* If connection was _not_ established and a signal/timeout came
+                * to be, we want the socket's state reset. User space may want
+                * to retry.
+                *
+                * sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED implies that socket is not on
+                * vsock_connected_table. We keep the binding and the transport
+                * assigned.
+                */
+               if (signal_pending(current) || timeout == 0) {
+                       err = timeout == 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : 
sock_intr_errno(timeout);
+
+                       /* Listener might have already responded with
+                        * VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RESPONSE. Its handling expects our
+                        * sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT, which hereby we break.
+                        * In such case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST will follow.
+                        */
                        sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
                        sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
+
+                       /* Try to cancel VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_REQUEST skb sent out by
+                        * transport->connect().
+                        */
                        vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
+
                        goto out_wait;
                }
 

---
base-commit: 106a67494c53c56f55a2bd0757be0edb6eaa5407
change-id: 20250815-vsock-interrupted-connect-f92dfa5042cd

Best regards,
-- 
Michal Luczaj <[email protected]>


Reply via email to