On 13/10/2025 18.26, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> The -EEXIST errno is reserved by the module loading functionality. When
> userspace calls [f]init_module(), it expects a -EEXIST to mean that the
> module is already loaded in the kernel. If module_init() returns it,
> that is not true anymore.
> 
> Add a warning and override the return code to workaround modules
> currently returning the wrong code. It's expected that they eventually
> migrate to a better suited error.
> 
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

Technically not true anymore since I delayed this review for quite some time.

FYI, this other patch actually fixes the problem for that driver:

54416fd76770 netfilter: conntrack: helper: Replace -EEXIST by -EBUSY

> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/module/main.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index c66b261849362..74ff87b13c517 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -3038,6 +3038,11 @@ static noinline int do_init_module(struct module *mod)
>       if (mod->init != NULL)
>               ret = do_one_initcall(mod->init);
>       if (ret < 0) {
> +             if (ret == -EEXIST) {
> +                     pr_warn("%s: init suspiciously returned -EEXIST: 
> Overriding with -EBUSY\n",
> +                             mod->name);
> +                     ret = -EBUSY;
> +             }
>               goto fail_free_freeinit;
>       }
>       if (ret > 0) {
> 

Reply via email to