On 2025/11/13 21:14, Sun Shaojie wrote:
> In cgroup v2, a mutual overlap check is required when at least one of two
> cpusets is exclusive. However, this check should be relaxed and limited to
> cases where both cpusets are exclusive.
> 
> The table 1 shows the partition states of A1 and B1 after each step before
> applying this patch.
> 
> Table 1: Before applying the patch
>  Step                                       | A1's prstate | B1's prstate |
>  #1> mkdir -p A1                            | member       |              |
>  #2> echo "0-1" > A1/cpuset.cpus            | member       |              |
>  #3> echo "root" > A1/cpuset.cpus.partition | root         |              |
>  #4> mkdir -p B1                            | root         | member       |
>  #5> echo "0-3" > B1/cpuset.cpus            | root invalid | member       |
>  #6> echo "root" > B1/cpuset.cpus.partition | root invalid | root invalid |
> 
> After step #5, A1 changes from "root" to "root invalid" because its CPUs
> (0-1) overlap with those requested by B1 (0-3). However, B1 can actually
> use CPUs 2-3, so it would be more reasonable for A1 to remain as "root."
> 
> This patch relaxes the exclusive cpuset check for cgroup v2 while
> preserving the current cgroup v1 behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sun Shaojie <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>   - Keeps the current cgroup v1 behavior unchanged
>   - Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/cgroups/[email protected]
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c                            |  9 +++++++--
>  tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 10 +++++-----
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 52468d2c178a..3240b3ab5998 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -592,8 +592,13 @@ static inline bool cpusets_are_exclusive(struct cpuset 
> *cs1, struct cpuset *cs2)
>   */
>  static inline bool cpus_excl_conflict(struct cpuset *cs1, struct cpuset *cs2)
>  {
> -     /* If either cpuset is exclusive, check if they are mutually exclusive 
> */
> -     if (is_cpu_exclusive(cs1) || is_cpu_exclusive(cs2))
> +     /* If both cpusets are exclusive, check if they are mutually exclusive 
> */
> +     if (is_cpu_exclusive(cs1) && is_cpu_exclusive(cs2))
> +             return !cpusets_are_exclusive(cs1, cs2);
> +
> +     /* In cgroup-v1, if either cpuset is exclusive, check if they are 
> mutually exclusive */
> +     if (!is_in_v2_mode() &&
> +         (is_cpu_exclusive(cs1) != is_cpu_exclusive(cs2)))
>               return !cpusets_are_exclusive(cs1, cs2);
>  

I prefer adding a helper function in the cpuset-v1.c file, similar to 
cpus_excl_conflict_legacy().

For cpuset v1, it can simply return cpus_excl_conflict_legacy(). It seems that 
other rules are not
relevant to v1.

>       /* Exclusive_cpus cannot intersect */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> index a17256d9f88a..903dddfe88d7 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ TEST_MATRIX=(
>       " C0-3:S+ C1-3:S+ C2-3     .    X2-3   X3:P2    .      .     0 
> A1:0-2|A2:3|A3:3 A1:P0|A2:P2 3"
>       " C0-3:S+ C1-3:S+ C2-3     .    X2-3   X2-3  X2-3:P2   .     0 
> A1:0-1|A2:1|A3:2-3 A1:P0|A3:P2 2-3"
>       " C0-3:S+ C1-3:S+ C2-3     .    X2-3   X2-3 X2-3:P2:C3 .     0 
> A1:0-1|A2:1|A3:2-3 A1:P0|A3:P2 2-3"
> -     " C0-3:S+ C1-3:S+ C2-3   C2-3     .      .      .      P2    0 
> A1:0-3|A2:1-3|A3:2-3|B1:2-3 A1:P0|A3:P0|B1:P-2"
> +     " C0-3:S+ C1-3:S+ C2-3   C2-3     .      .      .      P2    0 
> A1:0-1|A2:1|A3:1|B1:2-3 A1:P0|A3:P0|B1:P2 2-3"
>       " C0-3:S+ C1-3:S+ C2-3   C4-5     .      .      .      P2    0 B1:4-5 
> B1:P2 4-5"
>       " C0-3:S+ C1-3:S+ C2-3    C4    X2-3   X2-3  X2-3:P2   P2    0 
> A3:2-3|B1:4 A3:P2|B1:P2 2-4"
>       " C0-3:S+ C1-3:S+ C2-3    C4    X2-3   X2-3 X2-3:P2:C1-3 P2  0 
> A3:2-3|B1:4 A3:P2|B1:P2 2-4"
> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ TEST_MATRIX=(
>       # Invalid to valid local partition direct transition tests
>       " C1-3:S+:P2 X4:P2  .      .      .      .      .      .     0 
> A1:1-3|XA1:1-3|A2:1-3:XA2: A1:P2|A2:P-2 1-3"
>       " C1-3:S+:P2 X4:P2  .      .      .    X3:P2    .      .     0 
> A1:1-2|XA1:1-3|A2:3:XA2:3 A1:P2|A2:P2 1-3"
> -     "  C0-3:P2   .      .    C4-6   C0-4     .      .      .     0 
> A1:0-4|B1:4-6 A1:P-2|B1:P0"
> +     "  C0-3:P2   .      .    C4-6   C0-4     .      .      .     0 
> A1:0-4|B1:5-6 A1:P2|B1:P0 0-4"
>       "  C0-3:P2   .      .    C4-6 C0-4:C0-3  .      .      .     0 
> A1:0-3|B1:4-6 A1:P2|B1:P0 0-3"
>  
>       # Local partition invalidation tests
> @@ -388,10 +388,10 @@ TEST_MATRIX=(
>       "  C0-1:S+  C1      .    C2-3     .      P2     .      .     0 
> A1:0-1|A2:1 A1:P0|A2:P-2"
>       "  C0-1:S+ C1:P2    .    C2-3     P1     .      .      .     0 
> A1:0|A2:1 A1:P1|A2:P2 0-1|1"
>  
> -     # A non-exclusive cpuset.cpus change will invalidate partition and its 
> siblings
> -     "  C0-1:P1   .      .    C2-3   C0-2     .      .      .     0 
> A1:0-2|B1:2-3 A1:P-1|B1:P0"
> +     # A non-exclusive cpuset.cpus change will not invalidate partition and 
> its siblings
> +     "  C0-1:P1   .      .    C2-3   C0-2     .      .      .     0 
> A1:0-2|B1:3 A1:P1|B1:P0"
>       "  C0-1:P1   .      .  P1:C2-3  C0-2     .      .      .     0 
> A1:0-2|B1:2-3 A1:P-1|B1:P-1"
> -     "   C0-1     .      .  P1:C2-3  C0-2     .      .      .     0 
> A1:0-2|B1:2-3 A1:P0|B1:P-1"
> +     "   C0-1     .      .  P1:C2-3  C0-2     .      .      .     0 
> A1:0-1|B1:2-3 A1:P0|B1:P1"
>  
>       # cpuset.cpus can overlap with sibling cpuset.cpus.exclusive but not 
> subsumed by it
>       "   C0-3     .      .    C4-5     X5     .      .      .     0 
> A1:0-3|B1:4-5"

-- 
Best regards,
Ridong


Reply via email to