On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:21:30 -0500 James Bottomley <[email protected]> wrote:
> As far as the copyright status of AI output in the US goes, as long as > its not derivative of something, then it's a non-human creation and as > such cannot be copyrighted at all, so it's equivalent to public domain. I believe that's what is currently being argued in court. If AI is trained on human content and prints out something based on it, is it a non-human creation? This isn't a case of a monkey taking a selfie, where the content provider is clearly non-human. This is a machine that uses human created content to derive new creations. -- Steve
