On 31/10/2025 13.57, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 8:47 AM Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I already asked this in reply to the cover letter, but the question was
>> lost on the way (no offense!), so I'm asking again. As it only really
>> affects this patch, I'm doing that here:
>>
>> Can I have some blessing to take this patch via my pwm tree? Would you
>> prefer a tag to also merge it into your tree? Then I would apply it on
>> top of 6.18-rc1 and provide a tag for you to merge.
>
> Sounds fine to me, but I am Cc'ing the modules maintainers since they
> were not, just in case:
>
> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
>
> I think we don't need the tag/merge, unless someone else is looking to
> use this (is there such a user? I may have missed it).
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
Uwe, that's okay from modules side:
Acked-by: Daniel Gomez <[email protected]>
FYI, I haven't merged Andreas's patches (rust: extend `module!` macro with
integer parameter support) yet, which add rust/macros/module.rs to our
MAINTAINERS file list. So, it's fine from modules side to go through your tree.
I was aiming to merge these patches along with some others for this week but
I've found a regression in kmod testing introduced in the latest v6.18-rc1,
which is taking me some extra time.
