On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Frankly I'm not sure this test is worth the compute cycles it will burn. > It's a direct repro for a very specific problem. The changes it will > occur again for the same field a pretty low. Maybe just repost patch 1?
Fair enough. I will repost with only patch 1 then.
