On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:16:50PM -0700, Alok Tiwari wrote:
> virtio_vdpa_set_status() is declared as returning void, but it used
> "return vdpa_set_status()" Since vdpa_set_status() also returns
> void, the return statement is unnecessary and misleading.
> Remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <[email protected]>

Fixes: c043b4a8cf3b ("virtio: introduce a vDPA based transport")


> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
> index 657b07a60788..1abecaf76465 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void virtio_vdpa_set_status(struct virtio_device 
> *vdev, u8 status)
>  {
>       struct vdpa_device *vdpa = vd_get_vdpa(vdev);
>  
> -     return vdpa_set_status(vdpa, status);
> +     vdpa_set_status(vdpa, status);
>  }
>  
>  static void virtio_vdpa_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> -- 
> 2.50.1


Reply via email to