On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 09:19:13PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> The order of runtime PM API calls in the remove path is wrong.
> pm_runtime_put() should be called before pm_runtime_disable(), per the
> runtime PM guidelines.

Where is this mentioned?  I have looked in [1] and couldn't find anything.

[1]. Documentation/power/runtime_pm.rst

> Calling pm_runtime_disable() prematurely can
> lead to incorrect reference counting and improper device suspend behavior.
> 
> Additionally, proper cleanup should be done when rproc_add() fails by
> invoking both pm_runtime_put() and pm_runtime_disable() to avoid leaving
> the device in an inconsistent power state.
> 
> With using devm_pm_runtime_enable() for automatic resource management and
> introducing a devres-managed cleanup action imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put() to
> enforce correct PM API usage and simplify error paths, the upper two
> issues could be fixed. Also print out error log in case of error.
> 
> Fixes: a876a3aacc43 ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: detect and attach to pre-booted 
> remote cores")
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Hiago De Franco <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 
> bb25221a4a8987ff427d68e2a5535f0e156b0097..12305f36552fb5265b0953a099ea0d561880e3ff
>  100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -1046,6 +1046,13 @@ static int imx_rproc_sys_off_handler(struct 
> sys_off_data *data)
>       return NOTIFY_DONE;
>  }
>  
> +static void imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put(void *data)
> +{
> +     struct device *dev = data;
> +
> +     pm_runtime_put(dev);
> +}
> +
>  static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1125,12 +1132,23 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       }
>  
>       if (dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_SCU_API) {
> -             pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +             ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable runtime PM, %d\n", ret);
> +                     goto err_put_clk;
> +             }
> +
>               ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
>               if (ret) {
>                       dev_err(dev, "pm_runtime get failed: %d\n", ret);
>                       goto err_put_clk;
>               }
> +
> +             ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, imx_rproc_pm_runtime_put, 
> dev);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "Failed to add devm disable pm action: 
> %d\n", ret);
> +                     goto err_put_clk;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> @@ -1158,10 +1176,6 @@ static void imx_rproc_remove(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>       struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
>  
> -     if (priv->dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_SCU_API) {
> -             pm_runtime_disable(priv->dev);
> -             pm_runtime_put(priv->dev);
> -     }
>       clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
>       rproc_del(rproc);
>       imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
> 
> -- 
> 2.37.1
> 

Reply via email to