Hi, On Mon, 2025-09-15 at 18:44 +0200, Maximilian Immanuel Brandtner wrote: > [...] > As I already mentioned in the QEMU discussion, I proposed the fix, > because I was working on a similar implementation to bring resizing to > QEMU.
I couldn't find any mention of your implementation on the QEMU ML. > Unfortunately, the patch-set was stuck in limbo for a while and > now that someone else has picked up the slack, I've descided that it's > better to contribute to the patch-set that is upstream instead of > sending a competing patch-set that does the same thing. Would it be OK for me to take a look at your WIP patches? I would like to see if you did anything differently. Also, you mentioned before that you were also working on patches for Libvirt. These will still be useful, because I won't be implementing that part. > [...] > I don't really care if this discrepancy is fixed one way or the other, > but it should most definitely be fixed. I'm of the same opinion, but if it is fixed on the kernel side, then (assuming no device implementation with the wrong order exists) I think maybe the fix should be backported to all widely used kernels. It seems that the patch hasn't been backported to the longterm kernels [1], which I think Debian kernels are based on. [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/log/drivers/char/virtio_console.c?h=v6.12.47 > Kind regards, > Max Brandtner Regards, Filip Hejsek
