On 2025-09-15 09:11:09+0200, Benjamin Berg wrote: > From: Benjamin Berg <[email protected]> > > There is no errno variable when NOLIBC_IGNORE_ERRNO is defined. As such, > the perror function does not make any sense then and cannot compile. > > Fixes: acab7bcdb1bc ("tools/nolibc/stdio: add perror() to report the errno > value") > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]> > --- > tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h > index 7630234408c5..c512159b8374 100644 > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h > @@ -597,11 +597,13 @@ int sscanf(const char *str, const char *format, ...) > return ret; > } > > +#ifndef NOLIBC_IGNORE_ERRNO > static __attribute__((unused)) > void perror(const char *msg) > { > fprintf(stderr, "%s%serrno=%d\n", (msg && *msg) ? msg : "", (msg && > *msg) ? ": " : "", errno); > } > +#endif > > static __attribute__((unused)) > int setvbuf(FILE *stream __attribute__((unused)), > -- > 2.51.0 >
