> From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, September 1, 2025 7:32 AM
> 
> The iommu_deferred_attach() function invokes __iommu_attach_device()
> while
> not holding the group->mutex, like other __iommu_attach_device() callers.
> 
> Though there is no pratical bug being triggered so far, it would be better
> to apply the same locking to this __iommu_attach_device(), since the
> IOMMU
> drivers nowaday are more aware of the group->mutex -- some of them use
> the
> iommu_group_mutex_assert() function that could be potentially in the path
> of an attach_dev callback function invoked by the __iommu_attach_device().
> 
> The iommu_deferred_attach() will soon need to verify a new flag stored in
> the struct group_device. To iterate the gdev list, the group->mutex should
> be held for this matter too.
> 
> So, grab the mutex to guard __iommu_attach_device() like other callers.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <[email protected]>

Reply via email to