Re: [PATCH 6/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Clean up after ops introduction

[Frank Li]

On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 09:07:39PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> With the switch-case in imx_rproc_{start,stop}{} removed, simplify
> the code logic by removing 'goto'. The last switch-case in
> imx_rproc_detect_mode() are no longer needed and can be removed.
>
> This cleanup improves code readability and aligns with the new ops-based
> design.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 25 +++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 
> 5fa729f4286f6ac939357c32fef41d7d97e5f860..ed8395b097d07d02e5323550ff497819f9b95ad6
>  100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -323,14 +323,11 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>       if (ret)
>               return ret;
>
> -     if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->start) {
> +     if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->start)
>               ret = dcfg->ops->start(rproc);
> -             goto start_ret;
> -     }
> -
> -     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +     else
> +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> -start_ret:
>       if (ret)
>               dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable remote core!\n");
>
> @@ -380,14 +377,11 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>       struct device *dev = priv->dev;
>       int ret;
>
> -     if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->stop) {
> +     if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->stop)
>               ret = dcfg->ops->stop(rproc);
> -             goto stop_ret;
> -     }
> -
> -     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +     else
> +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> -stop_ret:
>       if (ret)
>               dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop remote core\n");
>       else
> @@ -1000,13 +994,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
>       if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->detect_mode)
>               return dcfg->ops->detect_mode(priv->rproc);
>
> -     switch (dcfg->method) {
> -     case IMX_RPROC_NONE:
> +     if (dcfg->method == IMX_RPROC_NONE)

Is it possible remove "method"? Can you check dcfg->ops->dectect_mode NULL
here?

Frank Li
>               priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
> -             return 0;
> -     default:
> -             break;
> -     }
>
>       return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>