On Wednesday, 30 of January 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I get these messages, the majority of which seem to be false-positives: > ... > > modpost: Found 35 section mismatch(es). > > To see additional details select "Enable full Section mismatch analysis" > > in the Kernel Hacking menu (CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH). > Looking in to these atm. > > > > > and if I compile the kernel with CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH, it breaks resuming > > from RAM. > > The only functional difference when you enable CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH is the > addition of the -fno-inline-functions-called-once to CFLAGS. > So we have some code somewhere that breaks if it is not inlined by gcc. > > It would be nice to sort out where. > If you have a rough idea where to look
No, I don't. It looks like there's somewhere in arch/x86, since I ruled out kernel/power and drivers/acpi already. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
