* Hans de Goede <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Which IMHO is much more readable then what has landed now. But since
> >> v2 has already landed I guess the best thing is just to stick with
> >> what we have upstream now...
> >
> > Well, how about we do a delta patch with all the changes you suggested?
> > I'm all for readability.
>
> So I started doing this and notices that all the string manipulation +
> parsing done here is really just a DYI implementation of
> sysfs_match_string().
>
> So I have prepared a patch to switch to sysfs_match_string(), which
> completely removes the need to make a copy of the val string.
>
> I'll submit the patch right after this email.
Thank you - that looks a far more thorough cleanup indeed.
Ingo
