On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 02:03:57PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> +     id = dax_read_lock();
> +     while ((ret = iomap_iter2(&it_src, &it_dest, ops)) > 0) {
> +             it_src.processed = it_dest.processed =
> +                     dax_range_compare_iter(&it_src, &it_dest, same);
> +     }
> +     dax_read_unlock(id);

I think it would be better to move the DAX locking into
dax_range_compare_iter to avoid very long hold times.

> +     return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_dedupe_file_range_compare);

No need for the export.

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_remap_file_range_prep);

EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, please.

Attached is a totally untested patch that just has two levels of
iterations instead of the new iter2 helper:


diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 0e0536765a7efc..2b65471785290d 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -1885,6 +1885,7 @@ static loff_t dax_range_compare_iter(struct iomap_iter 
*it_src,
        loff_t len = min(smap->length, dmap->length);
        void *saddr, *daddr;
        int ret;
+       int id;
 
        if (smap->type == IOMAP_HOLE && dmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE) {
                *same = true;
@@ -1896,47 +1897,56 @@ static loff_t dax_range_compare_iter(struct iomap_iter 
*it_src,
                return 0;
        }
 
+       id = dax_read_lock();
        ret = dax_iomap_direct_access(smap, pos1, ALIGN(pos1 + len, PAGE_SIZE),
                                      &saddr, NULL);
        if (ret < 0)
-               return -EIO;
+               goto out_unlock;
 
        ret = dax_iomap_direct_access(dmap, pos2, ALIGN(pos2 + len, PAGE_SIZE),
                                      &daddr, NULL);
        if (ret < 0)
-               return -EIO;
+               goto out_unlock;
 
        *same = !memcmp(saddr, daddr, len);
        if (!*same)
-               return 0;
+               len = 0;
+       dax_read_unlock(id);
        return len;
+
+out_unlock:
+       dax_read_unlock(id);
+       return -EIO;
 }
 
 int dax_dedupe_file_range_compare(struct inode *src, loff_t srcoff,
-               struct inode *dest, loff_t destoff, loff_t len, bool *same,
+               struct inode *dst, loff_t dstoff, loff_t len, bool *same,
                const struct iomap_ops *ops)
 {
-       struct iomap_iter it_src = {
+       struct iomap_iter src_iter = {
                .inode          = src,
                .pos            = srcoff,
                .len            = len,
        };
-       struct iomap_iter it_dest = {
-               .inode          = dest,
-               .pos            = destoff,
+       struct iomap_iter dst_iter = {
+               .inode          = dst,
+               .pos            = dstoff,
                .len            = len,
        };
-       int id, ret;
+       int ret;
 
-       id = dax_read_lock();
-       while ((ret = iomap_iter2(&it_src, &it_dest, ops)) > 0) {
-               it_src.processed = it_dest.processed =
-                       dax_range_compare_iter(&it_src, &it_dest, same);
+       while ((ret = iomap_iter(&src_iter, ops)) > 0) {
+               while ((ret = iomap_iter(&dst_iter, ops)) > 0) {
+                       dst_iter.processed = dax_range_compare_iter(&src_iter,
+                                       &dst_iter, same);
+                       if (dst_iter.processed > 0)
+                               src_iter.processed += dst_iter.processed;
+                       else if (!src_iter.processed)
+                               src_iter.processed = dst_iter.processed;
+               }
        }
-       dax_read_unlock(id);
        return ret;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_dedupe_file_range_compare);
 
 int dax_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
                              struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
@@ -1946,4 +1956,4 @@ int dax_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, 
loff_t pos_in,
        return __generic_remap_file_range_prep(file_in, pos_in, file_out,
                                               pos_out, len, remap_flags, ops);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_remap_file_range_prep);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_remap_file_range_prep);

Reply via email to