From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Clang doesn't like format strings that truncate a 32-bit
value to something shorter:
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:709:4: error: format specifies type 'short' but the
argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
In this case, the warning is a slightly questionable, as it could realize
that both class->wait_type_outer and class->wait_type_inner are in fact
8-bit struct members, even though the result of the ?: operator becomes an
'int'.
However, there is really no point in printing the number as a 16-bit
'short' rather than either an 8-bit or 32-bit number, so just change
it to a normal %d.
Fixes: de8f5e4f2dc1 ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 70bf3e48eae3..bb3b0bc6ee17 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static void print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class)
printk(KERN_CONT " (");
__print_lock_name(class);
- printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}-{%hd:%hd}", usage,
+ printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}-{%d:%d}", usage,
class->wait_type_outer ?: class->wait_type_inner,
class->wait_type_inner);
}
--
2.29.2
