On 03/12, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > I am going to kibitz just a little bit more. > > When I looked at this a second time it became apparent that using > pid_task twice should actually be faster as it removes a dependent load > caused by thread_group_leader, and replaces it by accessing two adjacent > pointers in the same cache line.
Heh, I think this code should be optimized for the reader in the first place ;) But as I said I won't argue, readability is very subjective, I am fine with your version too. Oleg.
