On 09/03/2021 09:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 08/03/2021 19:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> The Stratix 10 / Agilex / N5X clocks do not use anything other >> than OF or COMMON_CLK so they should be compile testable on most of >> the platforms. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> <[email protected]> --- drivers/clk/Makefile | 5 >> +---- drivers/clk/socfpga/Kconfig | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ 2 >> files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile index >> 12e46b12e587..9b582b3fca34 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/Makefile +++ >> b/drivers/clk/Makefile @@ -104,10 +104,7 @@ obj-y >> += renesas/ >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rockchip/ >> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG) += samsung/ >> obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_SIFIVE) += sifive/ -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA) >> += >> socfpga/ -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AGILEX) += socfpga/ >> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_N5X) += socfpga/ >> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_STRATIX10) += socfpga/ +obj-y >> += socfpga/ >> obj-$(CONFIG_PLAT_SPEAR) += spear/ obj-y >> += sprd/ >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_STI) += st/ diff --git >> a/drivers/clk/socfpga/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/socfpga/Kconfig index >> 4922cc35f4cc..de7b3137e215 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/socfpga/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/clk/socfpga/Kconfig @@ -1,13 +1,23 @@ # >> SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +config COMMON_CLK_SOCFPGA + bool >> "Intel SoCFPGA family clock support" if COMPILE_TEST > > Kernel test robot found here wrong configuration - possibility to > disable the clocks with compile test. I'll send a v2.
Uh, that's not that easy. Intel created three different arm64 architectures for one real arm64 architecture... I guess it was driven by the marketing but here we are - the solution would be to have entries like: bool "Intel SoCFPGA family clock support" if COMPILE_TEST && !ARCH_AGILEX && !ARCH_N5X && !ARCH_SOCFPGA && !ARCH_STRATIX10 ... bool "Intel Stratix / Agilex / N5X clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST && !ARCH_AGILEX && !ARCH_N5X && !ARCH_STRATIX10 ... bool "Intel Agilex / N5X clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST && !ARCH_AGILEX && !ARCH_N5X ... I think it looks wrong. The stratix/agilex/n5x are basically flavors of socfpga from Linux point of view. This is the same architecture for Linux kernel, from high level point of view. Instead of going with unified ARCH_SOCFPGA (like all other platforms, e.g. Renesas, NXP), the Intel create three different kernel-wide arm64 ARCH_xxx symbols. It's too much. How about converting all these arm64 Intel platforms to ARCH_SOCFPGA? Best regards, Krzysztof
