Hi Wanghuiqiang,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wanghuiqiang
> Sent: 15 December 2020 07:49
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <[email protected]>;
> Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Linuxarm
> <[email protected]>; xuwei (O) <[email protected]>
> Subject: 答复: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Check SRE bit for GICv2 legacy support
> 
> Sorry response late.
> Hi Shameer & Ard,
> 
> Could you let me know which firmware you are using? If the difference is Madt
> table vGIC your pointed , they are the same. We changed the vGIC memory
> base address at very early design stage.

I checked the below ones and all these boards has the issue,

Openlab-Board - 69009,

DMI: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V3.B270.01 05/08/2020

Openlab-Board-69008,

DMI: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V5.B030.01 07/03/2020

UK-D06CS-board,

Boot firmware (version 2280-V2 CS V3.B220.01 built at 03/19/2020  16:52)

Thanks,
Shameer

> Thanks!
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> 发送时间: 2020年12月2日 16:23
> 收件人: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
> 抄送: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Linuxarm
> <[email protected]>; wanghuiqiang <[email protected]>; xuwei
> (O) <[email protected]>
> 主题: RE: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Check SRE bit for GICv2 legacy support
> 
> [+]
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 30 November 2020 18:32
> > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected];
> > Linuxarm <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Check SRE bit for GICv2 legacy
> > support
> >
> ...
> 
> >
> > Any clue why production D06 firmware deviates from the D06 port that
> > exists in Tianocore's edk2-platforms repository? Because that version
> > does not have this bug, and I wonder why that code was upstreamed at
> > all if a substantially different version gets shipped with production
> > hardware.
> 
> Ok. Thanks for pointing this out. I have informed our UEFI team about this.
> They will check Internally and clarify.
> 
> Regards,
> Shameer

Reply via email to