On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 7:09 PM Petr Mladek <[email protected]> wrote: > > + if (reboot_cpu >= num_possible_cpus()) { > > + pr_err("Ignoring the CPU number in reboot= > > option. " > > + "CPU %d exceeds possible cpu number > > %d\n", > > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl used to complain that printk() format parameter > should stay > on a single line (ignoring 80 char limit). It helps when people are > trying to find which code printed a particular message. > > It is not a big deal here because %d does not allow to search the > entire message anyway. > > I am not sure if Andrew would like to get this fixed. In both cases: > > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> >
Yes, I saw this warning, but to suppress it I had to write a 133 char line, much beyond even the new 100 char limit. I expect a smart user to just grep the first half of the string, like "Ignoring the CPU number in reboot=" Regards, -- per aspera ad upstream
