From: Greg Kurz <[email protected]> commit 0210a8db2aeca393fb3067e234967877e3146266 upstream.
When the IOTLB device is enabled, the vring addresses we get from userspace are GIOVAs. It is thus wrong to pass them down to access_ok() which only takes HVAs. Access validation is done at prefetch time with IOTLB. Teach vq_access_ok() about that by moving the (vq->iotlb) check from vhost_vq_access_ok() to vq_access_ok(). This prevents vhost_vring_set_addr() to fail when verifying the accesses. No behavior change for vhost_vq_access_ok(). BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883084 Fixes: 6b1e6cc7855b ("vhost: new device IOTLB API") Cc: [email protected] CC: [email protected] # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -1299,6 +1299,11 @@ static bool vq_access_ok(struct vhost_vi struct vring_used __user *used) { + /* If an IOTLB device is present, the vring addresses are + * GIOVAs. Access validation occurs at prefetch time. */ + if (vq->iotlb) + return true; + return access_ok(desc, vhost_get_desc_size(vq, num)) && access_ok(avail, vhost_get_avail_size(vq, num)) && access_ok(used, vhost_get_used_size(vq, num)); @@ -1394,10 +1399,6 @@ bool vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_vir if (!vq_log_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base)) return false; - /* Access validation occurs at prefetch time with IOTLB */ - if (vq->iotlb) - return true; - return vq_access_ok(vq, vq->num, vq->desc, vq->avail, vq->used); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_vq_access_ok);
