On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:48:39 -0800 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 24 November 2007, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > > > > > Why is this needed and is it perhaps something that can be moved > > > to the MMC core? > > > > We used to have lots of problems with overruns and underruns and > > those parameters were useful to limit the transfer rate. Now that > > the RDPROOF and WRPROOF bits seem to have taken care of these > > problems for good, I guess we can remove this parameter. > > Not all silicon *has* those bits though, right? Like at91rm9200. Right. The at91rm9200 doesn't have them, and I believe one of the at91sam926x chips (at91sam9261?) doesn't have them. So if we're going to merge this driver with at91_mci, I suppose it makes sense to keep this parameter. Haavard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
