The print in probe is done using pr_info. Correct print call would be dev_dbg because: - Severity should really be dbg - The dev pointer is given as first argument
Fixes: b014e9fae7e7de4329a7092ade4256982c5ce974 Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]> --- Sorry folks! This should have never slip in... drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c index 4137fa9a73bb..a8b5832a5a1b 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int bd957x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Found BD9576MUF\n"); break; case ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD9573: - pr_info(&pdev->dev, "Found BD9573MUF\n"); + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Found BD9573MUF\n"); break; default: dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported chip type\n"); -- 2.21.0 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
