Hi! > > > Besides: those suggestions are obviously valid for new bindings. What > > > about old bindings (.txt), which had no explicit SPDX tag or license note > > > before? What license would apply there? Is the .yaml file technically > > > new, when it was mostly just converted from .txt? > > > > If it is based on previous .txt binding, you have to respect previous > > author's license. That probably means GPL-2.0 only. > > Probably?
I have not checked exact licensing situation of that text, have not
decided if it was copyrightable in the first place, and am not a
lawyer.
So... probably :-).
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
